<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>debate team &#8211; The Hilltop Monitor</title>
	<atom:link href="https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/tag/debate-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu</link>
	<description>The Official Student Publication of William Jewell College</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 21:31:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Jewell debate kicks season off with virtual tournament, one team places in quarter finals</title>
		<link>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/jewell-debate-kicks-season-off-with-virtual-tournament-one-team-places-in-quarter-finals/</link>
					<comments>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/jewell-debate-kicks-season-off-with-virtual-tournament-one-team-places-in-quarter-finals/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michaela Esau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Campus News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewell Spotlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization Spotlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam testerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campus news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community & organization features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kenton fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michaela Esau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tavarus pennington]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/?p=14541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The William Jewell College debate team kicked off their season with the Rice and Friends Parli Opener Sept. 26 and 27. Tavarus Pennington, junior communication&#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p></p>



<p>The William Jewell College debate team kicked off their season with the Rice and Friends Parli Opener Sept. 26 and 27. Tavarus Pennington, junior communication major, and Kenton Fox, junior Oxbridge history of ideas major finished in the top eight at the virtual tournament. They won two debates before facing off with University of California, Berkeley.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignleft size-large is-resized"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screen-Shot-2020-10-08-at-7.20.37-PM.png" alt="" class="wp-image-14559" width="392" height="313"/><figcaption>Pennington and Fox during a debate tournament. Courtesy of <a href="https://www.instagram.com/williamjewelldebate/">@williamjewelldebate</a>.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The team of Gemma Flores-Olivera, junior physics major, and Jack Trent, first-year history major, rounded off the entries from Jewell. Adam Testerman, director of debate communication and assistant professor of communication, was pleased with the team’s performance at the tournament.</p>



<p>“Our team of first year debater, Jack Trent and his partner, Gemma Flores-Olivera faced off against several excellent opponents and it is awesome to see them develop their team identity,” Testerman said. “This is the best showing [Fox] and [Pennington] have put together in college debate and I am so impressed by them.”</p>



<p>Pennington and Fox have been debating at Jewell together since their first year. Fox enjoys the pace and complexity of debate.</p>



<p>“The debate game seems to stand alone in its capacity to call into question its very existence as a game, as a game among games, as the game in which we are competing when we talk entirely too fast using jargon exceeding even an acceptable academic vocabulary,” Fox said.</p>



<p>“Then some Berkeley a**holes beat us because they, despite having no theoretical depth, were undeniably better at the game,” Fox concluded.</p>



<p>Fox thinks it was his and Pennington’s ability to play the game that got them to the quarterfinals, where they were defeated by Berkeley.</p>



<p>William Jewell debate has undergone several changes this year. This is Testerman’s first year at Jewell. He comes to the college from Texas Tech University, where he spent five years as the director of debate.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large is-resized"><img decoding="async" src="https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screen-Shot-2020-10-08-at-7.22.06-PM.png" alt="" class="wp-image-14560" width="418" height="334"/><figcaption>Pennington and Fox during a debate tournament. Courtesy of <a href="https://www.instagram.com/williamjewelldebate/">@williamjewelldebate</a>.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Testerman says he has always been impressed by Jewell’s showing at debate tournaments and respected the program. His first tournament as a college debater even took place at William Jewell.</p>



<p>“When the position for Director of Debate came open, I jumped at the opportunity,” Testerman said of his decision to come to Jewell. “I love our beautiful campus, my [colleagues] in the Communication Department, and the opportunity to lead a storied debate program, especially one that the College recognizes as a core part of its identity.”</p>



<p>Another change facing Jewell debate is COVID-19. Typically debaters travel around the country for tournaments, but many of those tournaments are now being hosted virtually. Testerman notes that this new format does shift the dynamic.</p>



<p>“Many of the tools of persuasive speaking are thought to be achievable through in-person interactions, so finding new ways to package our performances has been a challenge, but one that we embrace. With difficult circumstances also come new opportunities – we feel incredibly lucky that we do an activity that can happen in these difficult times,” Testerman said.</p>



<p>Testerman is grateful that debate is able to continue with some semblance of normalcy when so many activities have had to pause competition. He is looking forward to the team improving this year.</p>



<p>“My hope is to establish a strong commitment to competition and approach the year seeking to be the best version of ourselves. Finding competitive success is a process, but we have greatness in us – I am looking forward to finding out who we are and what we can achieve,” Testerman said.</p>



<p>One of Testerman’s goals is to get more students involved in debate. The debate team is hoping to become more active on campus this year and to host a public Zoom debate later this semester.</p>



<p>Testerman is also considering starting a debate club in addition to the debate team for more students to join.</p>



<p>He encourages any students who want to be involved in debate to reach out, as there may be opportunities outside of the team’s competitive schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/jewell-debate-kicks-season-off-with-virtual-tournament-one-team-places-in-quarter-finals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is the William Jewell College debate team?</title>
		<link>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/who-is-the-william-jewell-college-debate-team/</link>
					<comments>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/who-is-the-william-jewell-college-debate-team/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelsey Neth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kelsey neth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/?p=1749</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You’ve seen the banners. You’ve seen the posts on social media. You’ve seen the new display case in the Yates-Gill Union holding a giant trophy.&#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="row-fluid ">
<div class="span12">
<div class="td-post-header-full td-image-gradient">
<header>
<div class="meta-info"><time class="entry-date updated" datetime="2016-04-22T08:00:47+00:00"></time></p>
<div class="entry-comments-views"></div>
</div>
</header>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row-fluid ">
<div class="span8 column_container td-post-content" role="main">
<div class="td-post-text-content">
<p>You’ve seen the banners. You’ve seen the posts on social media. You’ve seen the new display case in the Yates-Gill Union holding a giant trophy. So you know that a duo from the William Jewell College debate team is now a pair of national champions. However, while the team has remained very successful for many years, few people know anything about Jewell’s debate team or what college debate is like in general.</p>
<p>“I have found that many of the students on campus, especially the first-years, have no idea we even have a debate team,” said Tim Wise, first-year physics and communication major. “Some people have heard about it but don’t know anything more than the fact that the team exists.”</p>
<p>The Jewell debate team consists of 11 members, most of whom are first-year students. While having such a young team can create a unique dynamic, according to director of debate Kyle Dennis, the younger debaters benefited from being on a team with eventual national champions and witnessing the work and skill it takes to reach that level of competition. It also helped that the team members worked together very well.</p>
<p>“I’ve never coached a team that likes each other more than our team does,” said Dennis. “This team functions together nicely; we have a culture that is incredible.”</p>
<p>Other members of the team agree.</p>
<p>“Our team is pretty family-oriented,” said Haley Uttley, first-year political science major. “We really do all get along, which is pretty rare. We all enjoy each other’s presence and often spend time together outside of debate as well. I feel very lucky to be a part of this close-knit group.”</p>
<p>During practices, the debaters prepare for any topics they are given before tournaments through online research. If the tournament does not release the topics beforehand, they do practice rounds, watch videos of previous debates and keep up with current events.</p>
<p>“Our practices normally have a lot going on. Some people work on evidence, some people do practice rounds and some people just talk and bounce ideas off of each other for their next argument they are wanting to write. Everyone is at different stages in their debate progression, so everyone is normally working on something different,” said Uttley.</p>
<p>When the time for preparation is over, the team departs for their next tournament where, for the most part, every member of the team will compete. They argue in front of critics who tend to be more qualified than judges at high school debates.</p>
<p>“The critics are composed mainly of past debaters and coaches. Most of our judges travel across the country to all of our tournaments with teams and are very familiar with all of the debaters on the circuit. It is really nice to have experienced critics that are familiar with how debate works and how to judge,” said Uttley.</p>
<p>Overall, the students seem to value their experiences of being on the debate team. Doing debate not only offers a supportive group of friends but opportunities to grow academically and have intellectual arguments about real-life topics as well.</p>
<p>“For me, debate offers an opportunity to have in-depth discussions about issues like the economy, politics, racism, sexism and other issues that we face as a society,” said Wise. “Being a part of this program helps me voice and understand these issues by being able to discuss how these issues affect other people, rather than listening to a professor tell you that the problem exists.”</p>
<p>Debate can also influence how these students think in the classroom and how they can best communicate their ideas.</p>
<p>“Debate has always forced me to look at and understand all sides and solutions of every problem I’ve been presented. In the classroom, it means that I am usually able to quickly understand everybody’s arguments and the logic, behind them. I’ve become much more creative and open in my problem solving and it helps with more than you might think,” said Stefanie Flood, first-year Oxbridge institutions and policy major.</p>
<p>The debate team affects not only its members but all students at Jewell. The Jewell community can help the team by recognizing its existence and success, knowing how well they represent their institution across the country at every tournament and supporting the debate team through kind and encouraging words.<br />
“Our team is well known and respected around the country, which can be difficult for small schools like us to achieve,” said Flood. “While we are not exactly a spectator sport, we still love to have your support.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_8703" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://hilltopmonitor.com/who-is-the-william-jewell-college-debate-team/debate-infographic-3/" rel="attachment wp-att-8703"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-8703 size-full" src="https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?resize=700%2C1647" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" srcset="https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?w=2550 2550w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?resize=170%2C400 170w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?resize=213%2C500 213w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?resize=435%2C1024 435w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?resize=700%2C1647 700w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?resize=152%2C357 152w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?resize=205%2C483 205w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?resize=326%2C768 326w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?resize=459%2C1080 459w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?resize=765%2C1800 765w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?w=1400 1400w, https://i2.wp.com/hilltopmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Infographic.jpg?w=2100 2100w" alt="Debate Infographic" data-recalc-dims="1" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Infographic by Kelsey Neth.</figcaption></figure>
<p><i>Feature photo by Kyle Rivas. </i></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/who-is-the-william-jewell-college-debate-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jewell debate team wins national championship</title>
		<link>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/jewell-debate-team-wins-national-championship/</link>
					<comments>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/jewell-debate-team-wins-national-championship/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelsey Neth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 01:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kelsey neth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/?p=1786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This article is the first of a two-part series about the William Jewell College debate team.  William Jewell College is now the school of champions.&#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="row-fluid ">
<div class="span12">
<div class="td-post-header-full td-image-gradient">
<header>
<div class="meta-info">
<div class="entry-comments-views"><em>This article is the first of a two-part series about the William Jewell College debate team. </em></div>
</div>
</header>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row-fluid ">
<div class="span8 column_container td-post-content" role="main">
<div class="td-post-text-content">
<p>William Jewell College is now the school of champions. On March 22, seniors Katelyn Johnson and David Hansen, communication majors, won the 2016 National Parliamentary Debate Association (NPDA) championship tournament with a 7-0 decision in the final round.</p>
<p>“I was definitely nervous right before the final round,” said Johnson. “I was nervous right until they announced who won the round, to be honest. I felt good about the round but it’s still nerve-racking waiting for a couple hours to figure out whether or not you won your last debate round ever.”</p>
<p>The tournament, held at California State University at Long Beach, hosted over 170 teams competing for the title. Hansen and Johnson competed against Southern Illinois University (SIU) in the final round, the school with the 2014 winning team.</p>
<p>“I felt confident going into the final round,” said Hansen. “The team we were debating was very good – they were from the same school that won the tournament in 2014 – but we knew how to beat them. We had an argument that was smart and that we were well prepared and practiced on. We predicted what they would say and we knew how to answer it.”</p>
<p>The duo’s performance in the final round received praise from Dr. Todd Graham, director of debate at SIU, who agreed with the results.</p>
<p>“We got beat by a better team today,” said Graham. “William Jewell deserved to win the national championship, because they were the best team.”</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class=" wp-image-5190 alignleft" src="https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Champs-1-727x500.jpg" alt="" width="397" height="273" srcset="https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Champs-1-727x500.jpg 727w, https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Champs-1-768x528.jpg 768w, https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Champs-1-640x440.jpg 640w, https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Champs-1-100x70.jpg 100w, https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Debate-Champs-1.jpg 960w" sizes="(max-width: 397px) 100vw, 397px" /></p>
<p>Johnson and Hansen were known to have the potential to win this title, having finished ninth as a duo in the same tournament when they were sophomores and having individual successes throughout their junior year. With this being their senior year and last chance, there was the added pressure to achieve the highest award.</p>
<p>“This is something we had worked towards for years,” said Hansen. “[As a senior], any debate could be your last, so you can’t let that thought take hold of you in a round and make you choke. We spent so much time researching arguments, watching debates and practicing speeches that winning became that much more sweet.”</p>
<p>Another reason winning was so sweet was because, according to director of debate, Kyle Dennis, Jewell is the smallest school by far to take home the trophy.</p>
<p>“We don’t have divisions in debate,” said Dennis. “We debate, and can win, against schools like the University of Oregon, which is a top, Research I academic institution.”</p>
<p>Dennis pointed out that these schools are not only academically accomplished and well-known, but have huge student populations from which to draw their best two-person team and receive more scholarships and funding than the Jewell debate team. These factors make Johnson and Hansen’s national championship win even more impressive.</p>
<p>“Personally, I think the win proved to myself that I could achieve anything as long as I put my mind to it,” said Johnson. “I wasn’t very good at debate when I first started out so coming all that way just exemplified what hard work can do. I also think that the win will be beneficial for the team and for the school. I think this will prove to our younger students on the team that winning nationals is something that any one of them can do. It sort of broke the myth that winning nationals is impossible.”</p>
<p>Hansen and Dennis agreed that much of their success came because of the support of teammates and the College.</p>
<p>“We had debaters watching rounds, researching positions and supporting us the whole way through. Their help was indispensable,” said Hansen. “Also, we couldn’t have won without the College. Jewell’s rigorous courses, achieving student body and brilliant professors gave us the critical thinking skills needed to win. It’s a testament that Jewell’s investment in students creates results. I hope our win encourages the college to keep supporting extra-curricular academics.”</p>
<p><i>Watch the winning final round at </i><a href="http://youtu.be/GSPomzFMaTo" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><i>http://youtu.be/GSPomzFMaTo</i></a><i>, starting at the 28-minute mark.</i></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/jewell-debate-team-wins-national-championship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
