<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Iowa &#8211; The Hilltop Monitor</title>
	<atom:link href="https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/tag/iowa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu</link>
	<description>The Official Student Publication of William Jewell College</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 23:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>What happened at the Iowa Caucus</title>
		<link>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/what-happened-at-the-iowa-caucus/</link>
					<comments>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/what-happened-at-the-iowa-caucus/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hannah Tietz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/?p=12251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As the presidential primary nears, so does the Iowa caucus. Let’s first start with what the Iowa caucus actually is. CNN explains that if an&#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>As the presidential primary nears, so does the Iowa caucus. Let’s first start with what the Iowa caucus actually is.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="955" height="500" src="https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/iowa_app-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12257" srcset="https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/iowa_app-1.jpg 955w, https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/iowa_app-1-800x419.jpg 800w, https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/iowa_app-1-768x402.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 955px) 100vw, 955px" /><figcaption>Voters at Iowa Caucus</figcaption></figure>



<p><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2016/01/29/politics/iowa-caucuses-explainer/index.html">CNN</a> explains that if an Iowan wants to participate in the caucus, they must show up to their designated gym, church, library, etc. at a specific time and cannot be late. For the Republican caucus, participants begin with the Pledge of Allegiance and then vote on a ballot or write on a scrap piece of paper their choice. Local officials tally the votes and send them to Iowa GOP headquarters to add them to the whole state’s votes.</p>



<p>The Democratic caucus is more complicated, writes <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2016/01/29/politics/iowa-caucuses-explainer/index.html">CNN</a>. Once participants arrive, they congregate around the room in groups based on who they are voting for, and those who are unsure who to vote for go to the “uncommitted” group. Then, the votes are tallied. Then, groups that have a significant number of people overall, usually about 15% of the total participants there, move on to the next round of voting, while those in groups that don’t meet that threshold have a chance to move to a group that did meet the 15% requirement. This is quite controversial as nobody’s votes are secret.</p>



<p>Additionally, only registered Democrats and Republicans can participate, which leaves out other political parties.</p>



<p>As to the results of the Feb. 3 2020 Iowa Caucus, there is still some confusion, reported <a href="https://www.npr.org/2020/02/13/804491974/iowa-caucus-meltdown-proved-transparency-is-essential-election-watchers-say">NPR</a>. The reason for this is due to the app that Democrats used to vote at the caucus. No backup plan was put in place, therefore there was no way to prepare for the coding error that occurred with the app. However, it was reported that cybersecurity experts made sure the app was secure.</p>



<p>Troy Price, Iowa’s Democrat Party Leader, commented, &#8220;It is safe to say, this is not the caucus that hundreds of thousands of Iowa Democrats deserve.” According to <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/troy-price-resigns-as-head-of-iowa-democratic-party-after-bungled-caucuses/">CBS News</a>, Price has since resigned due to the outcome of this caucus.</p>



<p>After 100 percent of the results were in, the Iowa Democratic Party <a href="https://results.thecaucuses.org/">website</a> showed that Pete Buttigieg won the state delegate equivalent (SDE) with 26.2 percent and Bernie Sanders came in second with 26.1 percent of the SDEs. However, Sanders did win the popular vote with 26.5 percent, while Buttigieg got 25.1 percent. Following Buttigieg and Sanders for the SDE totals were Elizabeth Warren, then Joe Biden, and then Amy Klobuchar.</p>



<p>By Feb. 6, 3 days after the caucus, both Buttigieg and Sanders had declared victory, says the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dnc-chair-calls-for-recanvas-in-iowa/2020/02/06/0ec4dc4c-4906-11ea-9164-d3154ad8a5cd_story.html">Washington Post</a>.</p>



<p>Tom Perez, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/what-iowa-caucus-voters-reveal-about-democratic-party-n1123221">tweeted </a>in response to the results “Enough is enough. In light of the problems that have emerged in the implementation of the delegate selection plan and in order to assure public confidence in the results, I am calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to immediately begin a recanvas.” So far, no plans have been announced to recanvas the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/what-happened-at-the-iowa-caucus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic primary race in a state of flux after chaotic Iowa Caucuses</title>
		<link>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/democratic-primary-race-in-a-state-of-flux-after-chaotic-iowa-caucuses/</link>
					<comments>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/democratic-primary-race-in-a-state-of-flux-after-chaotic-iowa-caucuses/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyler Schardein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kyler schardein]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/?p=12222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A tumultuous and chaotic debacle at the Iowa Democratic Caucuses Feb. 3 has provoked much angst and grumbling within the Democratic Party, sown confusion into&#8230; ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<figure class="wp-block-image"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/48199534497_d015fb050d_b-1-1024x683.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12226" srcset="https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/48199534497_d015fb050d_b-1.jpg 1024w, https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/48199534497_d015fb050d_b-1-750x500.jpg 750w, https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/48199534497_d015fb050d_b-1-768x512.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption><a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/11020019@N04/48199534497">&#8220;Microphone and Iowa Democratic Party Podium&#8221;</a> by <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/11020019@N04">Lorie Shaull</a> is licensed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/?ref=ccsearch&amp;atype=html">CC BY-SA 2.0</a></figcaption></figure>



<p>A tumultuous and chaotic debacle at the Iowa Democratic Caucuses Feb. 3 has provoked much angst and grumbling within the Democratic Party, sown confusion into the presidential nomination race and placed the continuing preeminence of the Iowa Caucus under fire. </p>



<p><a href="https://www.npr.org/2016/01/29/464804185/why-does-iowa-vote-first-anyway">Reforms</a> enacted after the chaotic clash at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago established the modern presidential nominating contests. Since 1972, Iowa has held the marquee event of the nominating contests for the Democratic and Republican Parties. </p>



<p>The state has long drawn <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/2/4/21122213/iowa-democratic-caucus-results-disaster">criticism</a>, particularly crescendoing this year over its representativeness. Iowa is more than 85 percent white in a steadily diversifying nation and many members in the Democratic Party have called for a change in its placement. The debacle places Iowa’s delicate position as the first nominating contest, which has been under steadily mounting scrutiny, even more in doubt. </p>



<p><a href="https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/02/defending-the-iowa-caucuses-an-interview-with-iowa.html">Defenders</a> of the Iowa Caucus have noted two key advantages. One, that Iowa is a relatively small state where voters put a premium on retail politics so candidates that are less well-known nationally or have fewer resources have a shot to vault into the national spotlight by winning the Iowa Caucus. Famously, President Carter went from an obscure figure to eventually securing the Democratic nomination gaining prominence by winning the Iowa Caucus in 1976. </p>



<p><a href="https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/02/defending-the-iowa-caucuses-an-interview-with-iowa.html">The second value </a>of Iowa is that Iowa voters notably take the process seriously. Operatives who have worked presidential races in Iowa note that it is not unusual for the same voters to go to events for several candidates as they try to make up their minds, and by all indications Iowa maintained this reputation for diligence this year. </p>



<p>However the story of dysfunction in the Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) has been the leading story following the caucuses instead of any story about the putative winners. The Democratic presidential hopefuls were placed in an awkward position when the state party struggled to collect and release results.</p>



<p>To recap, the complicated Iowa Caucuses work much differently than the direct voting primaries where throughout a day voters simply go to a voting place and cast a private ballot for a candidate of their choice. </p>



<p>At the<a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/27/politics/iowa-caucuses-how-they-work/index.html"> Iowa Caucus</a> voters had to show up to specific caucus sites at a specific time. When they gather there, speeches are made by supporters of each candidate, and then there is the first vote. In the first vote, voters gather in clusters by the candidate they support. Then the caucus officials count how many people are in a grouping for each candidate.  Candidates need support from 15 percent of the total caucus goers at a site to be viable. If a candidate reaches viability, the supporters cannot realign, but for everyone whose candidate did not reach viability on the first vote, they either can realign on a second vote or choose to leave. </p>



<p>This year, in a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/us/politics/what-happened-iowa-caucuses.html">reform</a> for greater transparency pressed for by supporters of Sen. Sanders after his narrow loss to Hillary Clinton in the Iowa Caucuses in 2016, the Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) will release three sets of numbers: a candidate’s voters on the first round, a candidate’s voters on the final round of voting, and the candidate’s state delegate equivalent (SDE), which will be used to determine how many delegates to the national convention that candidate will garner. The IDP has encouraged all media to take the SDE result as the winner of the Iowa Caucus.  </p>



<p>According to reports out of Iowa, there is no singular reason for the disorder in Iowa but rather a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/us/politics/what-happened-iowa-caucuses.html">combination of failures</a> by the state party. The state had invested in a new app made by the company Shadow to allow precinct chairs to report results. However it appears the party never trained its volunteers in how to use the app, and even for those who could log on, the app did not function as it was intended to. </p>



<p>When the precinct chairs resorted to previous methods and attempted to<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/us/politics/what-happened-iowa-caucuses.html"> call in results</a>, many found phone lines to be completely jammed and had difficulty reaching party headquarters. It was not until late Tuesday that the IDP released even partial results.  </p>



<p>The process has resulted in much grumbling from the presidential candidates themselves and alighted swift criticism of the state party from many Democrats.  Along with the organizational failures, many have criticized the state party for its initial statement explaining that they were not releasing the results for “<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/us/politics/what-happened-iowa-caucuses.html">quality control</a>” and for generally being uncommunicative during the crisis. Indeed, members of various presidential candidate campaigns have complained about being hung up on when they tried to get information out of party headquarters the night of the caucuses. </p>



<p>Though the vote total is still apparently showing inconsistencies, and the <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/481949-ap-unable-to-declare-winner-in-iowa-caucuses">AP</a>, along with other media organizations, are refusing to call it, the IDP has <a href="https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/2/9/21125703/iowa-caucuses-2020-final-results-pete-buttigieg-wins">announced</a> that former South Bend mayor, Pete Buttigieg, won 14 delegates, closely followed by Sen. Bernie Sanders, who won 12, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who won eight, and former Vice President Joe Biden, who won six. Sen. Sanders also is leading in both the first vote totals and the realignment vote totals. </p>



<p>Notably, former Vice President Joe Biden <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/">underperformed</a> expectations set by his own campaign. Biden campaign officials had confidently predicted that the former vice president would be viable in more areas than he ended up in reality. </p>



<p>The race continues with the nation’s first primary in New Hampshire Feb. 11, closely followed by the <a href="https://nvdems.com/2020-caucus/">Nevada Caucus</a> Feb. 22 and the<a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/biden-faces-competition-black-vote-firewall-sc-68861978"> South Carolina primary</a>, rounding out the first round of nominating contests Feb. 29. Following South Carolina is <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/us/elections/2020-presidential-election-calendar.html">Super Tuesday</a>, when over a dozen states will hold their nominating contests. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who chose not to contest the first four nominating contests, has been <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/02/01/us/politics/01reuters-usa-election-fundraising.html">investing</a> hundreds of millions of dollars in the Super Tuesday states.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://hilltopmonitor.jewell.edu/democratic-primary-race-in-a-state-of-flux-after-chaotic-iowa-caucuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
