The Diet of the Average American

You’re probably eating too much meat. Now, I know what you’re thinking – don’t worry, I’m not trying to push a vegetarian lifestyle on you. However, an average American eats over three times the global average amount of meat and consumes one and a half times the average protein requirement in a day, according to a 2010 report, and meat intake in Americans has increased even since then. Further, most Americans do not meet the daily recommendations for vegetable or fruit intake. We’re seeing a wide-spread excess in meat/protein consumption and deficiency in the nutrients provided by plants.

The Health Benefits of Eating Less Meat

High meat consumption is associated with a plethora of health risks. Meat products often contain environmental pollutants that are highly soluble in fat, meaning that they won’t be flushed out in waste but rather stored in the body fat; this increases health risks, specifically for cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. Studies have also shown that a quarter of the meat eaten by Americans consists of processed meats like bacon, deli meats, hot dogs or sausages. Processed meats are much higher in cholesterol and saturated fats, which increases the risk of heart disease, hypertension and cerebrovascular incidents where blood flow to the brain is disrupted; additionally, processed meats were classified as carcinogenic to humans, specifically in relation to colorectal cancer, by the cancer agency of the World Health Organization. In the same study, red meats were classified as “probably carcinogenic to humans.” There is also strong evidence that high red meat intake increases the risk of diverticulitis, inflammation in the colon, among men. Multiple studies have also noted a link between red meat consumption and ulcerative colitis (UC), which is contributed to by the interaction of meat heme and amino acids with the gut microbiome; those components are converted into toxins that increase risk for UC. 

Diets that rely on more plant-based foods, however, provide various benefits to human health. Focusing on grains, lentils, peas, nuts, beans, vegetables and fruits culminates in a diet that is much richer in vitamins, fiber and other nutrients. This helps support heart and digestive health, as well as disease prevention. Meat-based proteins lack the amount of fiber, minerals, vitamins and antioxidants provided by plant-based proteins. That said, plant-based proteins are typically not complete proteins on their own, meaning they don’t contain all of the essential amino acids that your body needs to derive from food. As such, it is important to consume proteins from a wide variety of sources.

How to Make a Change

Making any big changes in your diet can be difficult, but you don’t have to make those changes all at once. A great first step may be to eat a meal with no meat once or twice a week. When eating plant-based proteins like beans, try to pair them with a whole grain like brown rice; this will provide the complete spectrum of amino acids that your body needs. Certain plant-based protein options do offer complete proteins completely on their own, such as tofu. These foods may seem overwhelming to prepare, but there are a lot of great resources online that outline easy ways to put together tasty dishes with no meat. Budget Bytes, for example, has great options listed for a variety of types of meals, and they’re all affordable. Alison Roman also keeps a list of unique dishes with no meat, which can be fun to make. Beyond Meat is a popular meat substitution brand, and their website includes recipes that teach you ways to prepare meat substitutes, if you’re interested in trying some of those out. There are many different ways to approach a meatless meal, and the internet is a wonderful resource for exploring them.

When you do eat meat, you may want to focus your consumption primarily around leaner meats, such as fish or poultry. Avoiding red meat outside of special occasions could be enormously beneficial, especially if eating entirely meatless meals is a struggle for you. You don’t have to completely cut anything out of your diet unless you want to, but being mindful about what you put on your plate now can make such a huge difference for your health down the line.

About a week ago, I was sitting on one of those red lawn chairs by Jewell Hall, just soaking in the sun, when I noticed something strange lying in the grass a few feet away, glittering in the bright midday light. I walked over and picked it up. Looking at it now, it seems to be a book or journal of some sort, written in a strange, hieroglyphic script which I have been working to decipher. Its cover is metal and has various buttons embedded in it, some of which make a strange beeping sound if I press them. As I began to read, I noticed the date on the inside front cover: January 26, 2961! Have I found an original document from the future? I can’t say for sure, but in the spirit of journalism I will share the contents of this book, and maybe one of you readers will be able to find out whether this could possibly be, indeed, a time traveler’s diary.

—

The research project has been approved. I am excited and honored to begin my dissertation studies by traveling to the ancient civilization of pre-Vorkopolik America, in the year 2026, to discover by experience the culture of its inhabitants and hopefully to conduct undercover exploration about their beliefs and customs. I have landed at what I believe to be the ancient city-state of Texas, and there seems to be some sort of religious celebration occurring which I have been observing for the past few hours. My list of observations grows steadily more unbelievable, but I swear I write nothing but the pure truth so help me Borg.

I was wearing my red, reflective antivirus suit which I had worried would cause the inhabitants some fear or confusion. However, as I walked into what, according to the signs, was the American Airlines center, the inhabitants seemed pleased and not at all offended by my hyperreflective outfit, instead uttering drawn-out grunts of some sort. One even offered me a ceremonial headpiece of the same color enscribed with the slogan to “Improve, Once More, America” or something like that. I did not get a chance to fully run text translation software. 

They all seemed to be headed to a specific area in the building, so I joined them. Following, I walked into a large amphitheater of some sort in the middle of what seemed to be a speech which I translated with my multi-language earpiece, although I believe it may have been malfunctioning, as I picked up audio of a very ugly old man attempting to bribe the Americanite people for their vote with a payment of $5,000 each should he win some sort of powerful title. If my calculator reports correctly, this would come to over $1.3 trillion, which in those days I believe was a lot of money although today Borg knows you can hardly get a tank of gas for less than $2 gongillion. Anyway, I began attempting to fix my translation headset as the speeches continued, but I continued to pick up fragments. I will have to confirm with the ship’s backup recordings, but I believe the same ugly man also stated that people who did not vote for him would be attending a place called “hell,” which after a brief jorblenet search I found to be a term for some sort of immortal torture location within the belief system of this civilization. To me, this seems like a harsh punishment, but I came to believe that these inhabitants thought of the ugly old man as their deity. There was little negative reaction to anything he told them, even when stating untruths such as that the area was “packed” (whereas from my calculations it seemed to be at a relatively low percentage of habitation. Perhaps “packed” is a piece of linguistic vernacular that my translator does not include and instead means something more like “a little more than half full or so”). 

The inhabitants also allowed themselves to be led in a sort of religious pact or oath, chanting that they respected the man as “the greatest President in the history of the United States that loves us so much he can’t breathe,” that they would “go out with … family and friends” and vote “if I’m registered or not. I’m going to try and cheat like hell.” This was surprising, because from what I had learned in Ancient History Seminar, cheating was generally a thing that the American peoples’ deity forbade, and so Americanites generally frowned on it unless it was conducted by the upper-class members of its caste system. I think I’ll have to take my translation software to the shop. 

After the event, I tried to ask some of the inhabitants what was going on. I believe there was some sort of virus spreading, though, because each person I asked responded with an exuberant “Trumpapalooza!” “Bless you,” I would respond. Good thing my reflective suit was also antibacterial. Switching tact, I tried to find out how each inhabitant ended up here. Surprisingly, I found that some of them had paid up to $20,000 (equivalent to approximately 3.8 squintillion in 2961 currency) to be there, while others had been given tickets for free or won them from lottery-style giveaways. Another sign pointing to this occurrence being of religious significance, as it includes an element of chance destining some to attend and some not to.

Having collected this fascinating research, I have begun preparations to return to my research academy. I believe that my dissertation thesis concerning religious practice in the ancient Americanite civilizations of the 1800-2300 period has been overall upheld by my immersion experience, although the technical difficulties were certainly annoying. In fact, as well as the potential issues with my translation software, I worry that the supply hold is loosening and will not latch properly. Hopefully nothing of value to my studies will fall out as I fly rapidly around the earth, attempting to gain enough velocity to shift back to the present day. Maybe in the future it will be more convenient to time travel. It’s so Borg-damn frustrating. 

Signing off,

Captain L. P. Exivor, Research Assistant for Prof. Broxiffle of the Ancient Studies Department, Ziglat State University.

Apparently, take off her clothes.

That uncomfortable reality sits at the heart of the backlash surrounding Euphoria star Sydney Sweeney’s new ad for sports betting company Novig. In it, Sweeney poses nearly nude, hugging footballs, basketballs, a tennis racket and other gear. The images are provocative and engineered to go viral, receiving over 22 million views in just two days.

What, exactly, are we being asked to notice? Sweeney? Her body? Or the sports themselves? That distinction is everything. This is not a call to police Sweeney’s choices; she has every right to own her image. Women can be sexual, self-assured and authentically themselves. The problem is when a woman’s body becomes the main event in a sports narrative, especially when she is not even an athlete.

The Fight to Be Seen

Women in sports already battle to be seen for their achievements, not just their bodies. Last year, nearly 3.54 million girls played high school sports in the U.S., accounting for 43% of all participants. At the college level, 242,341 women competed in NCAA athletics. Women are not side characters in American sports; they are nearly half the talent on the field, court, pool and track. Nevertheless, the struggle for equal opportunity is far from won. A 2024 GAO report shows women make up 56% of college students, yet only 42% of college athletes. At nearly two-thirds of colleges, women’s sports participation lags by at least 10 percentage points compared to enrollment. Four in ten colleges have not closed the gap since 2009-10. For decades, women have fought for funding, respect and the right to compete. Still, when they finally stand in the spotlight, another question arises: What are they being valued for? Female athletes face a constant balancing act. Strong, but not “too” strong; competitive, but always “feminine.” They are judged on their performances and their appearances, asked to perform at the highest level and then explain how they look doing it. Their bodies are both their instruments and their first hurdle.

There is no single age at which people start sexualizing girls in sports. Research does show, however, that the way female athletes are represented can affect how adolescent girls view both those athletes and themselves. Elizabeth Daniels, a developmental psychologist who researches gender, media and the experiences of girls and women, studied how different portrayals of female athletes affected adolescent girls and college women. In her 2012 study, Daniels examined responses from 258 girls ages 13-18 and 171 college women. She found that images of female athletes actively performing their sports encouraged viewers to focus on athletic ability and view those athletes as role models. Sexualized images, by contrast, encouraged more objectified views of both the athletes and themselves. Is it about what her body is doing or what her body looks like? 

Olympic figure skater Evgenia Medvedeva knows that line all too well. In a 2024 interview, she referenced being just 14 when judges told her to pad her costume because she did not have enough breasts for higher scores. Body commentary, she said, was simply routine in figure skating. Fourteen. At an age when most girls are still discovering themselves, an elite athlete was told she was not “feminine” enough. This is the culture young female athletes inherit.

Context Changes Everything

Sweeney’s response to the backlash made things even more tangled. She posted images of female athletes posing nude for ESPN’s Body Issue — Serena Williams, Ronda Rousey, Sue Bird, Megan Rapinoe, Caroline Wozniacki. Her argument: “Athletes do it too, so what is the difference?” The answer is context. Those athletes were featured because of what their bodies can do. The Body Issue celebrated the power, discipline and stories written in muscle and sweat. Those bodies were not just for display; years of training built them.

The Novig ad tells a different story. Sweeney is not there for her athletic skill; she is there for her appeal. That difference is exactly why so many athletes pushed back.

The Backlash from Pro Athletes

British sprinter Amy Hunt addressed Sweeney after competing at the Ultimate Championships, saying, “Sydney Sweeney, this is what women in sport look like.” She pointed to the reality behind elite performance: “Muscles, hard work, sweat, blood tears.” Those are the things the advertisement leaves out. The exhaustion. The injuries. The early mornings. The failed races. The missed opportunities. The hours of practice when nobody is watching.

Australian Olympic swimmer Ariarne Titmus made a similar argument, calling the advertisement “a kick in the face” to women who have dedicated their lives to perfecting their craft. She questioned how society could still be “monetizing a woman’s body and sexualising women’s sport.” Boxer Skye Nicolson made perhaps the clearest distinction: “There’s a big difference between looking ‘sexy’ because you do sport compared to using sex to sell ‘sport’.”

Its significance matters even more when considering how few female athletes actually make it to the professional level. The NCAA estimates only 0.8% of women’s college basketball players were drafted into the WNBA in 2024. Including international professional opportunities, NCAA estimates 9.1% of that cohort had professional opportunities. For most female college athletes, playing professionally is not the next step. It is an extraordinarily narrow path. The women who do make it have already spent years proving they belong. They should not then have to compete with another standard of attention, one that asks whether women are attractive enough to sell the sport.

Choice vs. Expectation

The history of women’s sports uniforms shows how complicated that expectation could become. In 2021, Norway’s women’s beach handball team was fined €1,500 after its players wore shorts instead of the bikini bottoms required by competition rules. The European Handball Federation classified the shorts as “improper clothing” and fined each player €150. The controversy was not about whether the athletes could play in the shorts. It was about whether they were showing the expected amount of skin. The real problem lies in the tension between choice and expectation. Nothing is wrong with a female athlete choosing a bikini. Nothing is wrong with an athlete choosing shorts. Nothing is wrong with a woman choosing to pose nude. The problem comes when women are expected to display their bodies to participate, compete, or attract attention. That is why this issue goes beyond Sweeney herself. Her campaign followed a well-worn playbook: appeal to the male gaze, go viral, and rake in exposure. Novig got what it wanted; the bigger question is what this strategy says about how women are still sold in sports.

Representation is not just about women being visible; it is about what they are valued for. A young athlete should see a woman in a sports ad and think, “I want to be that strong.” She should see a swimmer and want to work that hard. She should see an athlete and be inspired by what her body can do, not just how it looks. Beauty and sexuality are not the issue; it is the difference between valuing a woman’s accomplishments and using her body for clicks. Those are not the same.

A woman can be exceptional at her sport and still find that her appearance gets more attention than her performance. Women in sports have invested generations fighting to be seen as more than bodies. They have demanded the right to compete, to lead, to inspire. As a woman in sports, I know an athlete is never just a body. She is the hours no one sees, the losses she learns from, the work she puts in and the moments she earns.  Young girls are watching. They deserve to see women honored for their power and achievement. Women in sports are competitors, athletes, leaders, teammates and champions. Watch them for what they can do, not just for how they look.

You know their name. You know their major. You know where they usually sit in the cafeteria, what club they are involved in, or which professor they complain about after class. You have probably had at least one conversation that lasted long enough to make you think, I actually really like this person. You are not friends, exactly. But you are not strangers either.

College is full of people who occupy this strange middle ground. They are the people you recognize across campus, wave to when you pass them, talk to after class, and exchange the familiar phrase “ let’s hang out sometime.” You might follow each other on Instagram and know just enough about each other’s lives to feel familiar, but somehow never actually spend time together outside of the place where you met.

These are the people you keep almost becoming friends with.

Somewhere Between Stranger and Friend

College is an especially unique environment for creating these almost-friendships because our lives are divided into various spaces. You have your classes, your dorm, your job, your sport, your student organizations and the people you happen to sit next to at lunch. You can know someone well in one of those settings without ever getting to know them anywhere else.

This someone might be the person you always talk to before class, but once the professor dismisses everyone, you go your separate ways. You might spend three hours together at an organization meeting every week but never think to invite each other to the cafeteria. You might have a surprisingly deep conversation with someone at an event and then not see them again for a month.

None of these interactions are necessarily meaningless, in fact, some of them can make a large campus feel considerably smaller. There is something comforting about recognizing people. You start to notice familiar faces on your way to class; you know who will probably be sitting in the same spot at the next meeting. You begin to develop a collection of people you are happy to see, even if you would never describe them as close friends. Maybe that is one of the more underrated parts of college, not everyone you meet has to become a significant person in your life for the interaction to matter.

The “We Should Hang Out” Promise

Naturally, this is where the phrase “we should hang out sometime” gets thrown around. It is one of the most commonly used sentences in college, and it can mean almost anything. Sometimes it is genuine. Sometimes it is a polite way to end a conversation. Sometimes both people genuinely want to spend more time together but never figure out when. And sometimes, six months later, you run into that same person and realize you have said the exact same thing to each other at least three times. The funny thing is that neither person is necessarily lying. College students are busy. Between classes, homework, work, athletics, organizations and whatever else fills the calendar, finding time to turn a casual friendship into an actual friendship can be surprisingly difficult. There is also something slightly vulnerable about being the person who follows up.

It is easy to say, “We should hang out.”

It is harder to send the text: “Are you free Thursday?”

The second question creates the possibility of an actual answer. Maybe they are busy. Maybe they say no. Maybe they already have plans with someone else. Or maybe they say yes and the friendship actually moves beyond the hallway conversation. Sometimes the only thing standing between an acquaintance and a friend is someone being willing to make the first move, but that does not mean every almost-friendship needs to make that transition.

Maybe Almost-Friends Are Not a Bad Thing

There is a tendency to think of relationships as something that should constantly be moving forward. You meet someone, become friends, become close friends, and eventually add them to the group of people you cannot imagine college without. But real relationships do not always work that way. Some people will become your closest friends, others will remain the person you always enjoy talking to after class. Some will disappear from your life after a semester, some will come back to it years later. A person you barely knew freshman year might become a close friend later, while someone you spent every weekend with might eventually become little more than a familiar face.

There is no universal trajectory.

That can be especially easy to forget when social media makes friendship look so definitive. We see the group photos, birthday posts, weekend trips, and inside jokes, but rarely the dozens of casual relationships surrounding them. We see those who appear to be close without seeing how long it took to develop those friendships. The result is a strange pressure to categorize our own relationships. Are we friends? Are we actually close? Why wasn’t I invited? Should I be talking to them more? Sometimes the answer can simply be: We know each other. And that is enough.

Let People Surprise You

The best part about these almost-friendships is that they are not necessarily permanent. The person you only know from one class could end up becoming a close friend. The person you met during orientation might become someone you barely speak to by senior year. Someone you never expected to connect with might eventually become one of the most important people in your college experience.

That uncertainty is part of the fun.

College is one of the few times in life when you are constantly being introduced to new people, and there is no way to know which conversations will matter months or years from now. That does not mean every interaction needs to be carefully cultivated. It simply means there is value in being open to them.

So maybe the next time you tell someone, “We should hang out sometime,” you can actually make the plan. Or maybe you will see them next week, smile, ask how their class went, and continue on your way. Either way, you do not have to decide immediately what that person is going to mean to you. Some people become friends. Some remain acquaintances. Some become familiar faces who make campus feel a little more like home. And sometimes, the person you keep almost becoming friends with is exactly that: someone you have not become friends with yet. There is plenty of time for that to change.