Photo by Solen Feyissa via Uplash.

The influence of social media is nothing new. Many children have access to or  use social media platforms daily, but all this is possibly about to change. Australia is on track to pass a social media ban for children who are under the age of 16 to avoid trafficking and protect juveniles online. The plan behind this ban is to issue up to a $33 million fine for social media platforms if underage users are found on their sites. 

While many parents are protective over their kids’ safety, according to an article published by The Washington Post called “Can you stop a teen from using TikTok? Australia finds out,” experts and the owners of the sites aren’t as enthusiastic. Elon Musk, the owner of X, has reportedly called this law, “A backdoor way to control access to the internet by all Australians.” Other companies have expressed their concerns by calling this law “rushed” and saying there will be “unintended consequences.” Despite these protests, this ban idea is becoming more appealing to other countries and their leaders. Foreign countries are following suit, with Paris recently passing a bill that banned social media for teens under the age of 15. Trump’s top pick for U.S. Surgeon General, Janette Nesheiwat, has been claiming to want a social media ban for children since July of this year.

 During an interview with the Washington Post’s Tech Brief, Nesheiwat stated, “In my opinion, I think social media should be banned for all teenagers, to all young children, because it’s done nothing but harm.” This is a much different approach from what the current U.S. Surgeon General, Vivek H. Murthy, has taken in the past. Murthy has talked about parents working together to protect their children online, yet cabinet members have never called for a total social media ban. Nevertheless, Nesheiwat has come to the same conclusion that the legislative body in Australia has reached: there should be a ban on social media for teenagers under 16. 

Many have wondered if Nesheiwat can impose a ban, and it seems unlikely. A Washington Post article titled “Trump’s surgeon general pick called for banning social media for teens” has stated that a ban to this degree would anger groups that are a part of the tech trade, such as Amazon, Meta, and Google. The president-elect has yet to express his views on the topic. For now, America is at a standstill regarding social media and whether a ban is ethical. Meanwhile, Australia is heading towards the future with a ban attempting to keep teens off social media for as long as possible. As this trial run occurs across the ocean, other countries will be watching to see what happens and if parents can truly protect their children from the potential terrors of technology. 

From May 2 to Sep. 26, 2023, the Writers’ Guild of America (WGA) successfully secured a tentative agreement with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) after 148 days on strike, allowing all writers to resume work.

WGA and AMPTP have negotiated a 94-page Minimum Basic Agreement (MBA) that will last for three years. Outlined in the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) are payment increases, health contributions, improved terms and staffing minimums. 

The WGA has also secured protections against artificial intelligence (AI) in which AI cannot write or rewrite material, AI will not be considered a writer under the MBA and will not be credited as such, and AI usage cannot be required by companies. Companies must disclose to writers if given materials contain AI-generated content, and the exploitation of writers’ material to train AI is prohibited.

Similarly, from July 14 to Nov. 9, 2023, the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) have just recently struck a tentative agreement with the AMPTP after 118 days on strike.

SAG-AFTRA and AMPTP have negotiated a MOA with over 100 pages that will last for three years. Outlined in the MOA are payment increases, health contributions, protection against AI, equity and inclusion policies and sexual harassment policies. 

Compared to the WGA, the SAG-AFTRA protections against AI are seemingly more complex. Consent is required for the digital alteration of a performer in any form; however, some exceptions may be: (1) post-production editing for purposes of cosmetics, sound, timing, continuity, pitch, effects and filters, standards and practices, ratings, adjustment in dialogue or narration or other similar purposes; (2) audio dubbing or using a double if permitted under Codified Basic Agreement or Television Agreement; (3) facial or body adjusting, altering voice to a foreign language, or changing dialogue or imagery for licensing or selling.

Producers must notify and specify any nudity or sexual scenes that are expected of a performer before an audition or interview and no later than 48 hours in advance of call time. Producers are also encouraged to use an Intimacy Coordinator for nudity or simulated sex scenes and consider the use of an Intimacy Coordinator if requested by a performer for any scenes. All employees will be provided easy access to a company’s non-discrimination and anti-harassment policies.

Performers with disabilities can now request accessibility accommodations if the requests are reasonable. Protections for underage actors for auditions were also put in place. Producers may not request a performer of any age to appear nude or wear anything more revealing than a bathing suit appropriate for a public pool.

With many other policies put in place for income, benefits and such, the SAG-AFTRA and WGA have gained meaningful progress in the protections of their performers. This 3-year contract has sparked a new beginning for the writing and acting industry.