Sanders argued that access to health care should be guaranteed as a right. He regretted that the U.S. is the only developed country that does not assure near-universal health care coverage. This assertion has been verified by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Cruz argued that an individual’s right to health care should mean the right for the individual to choose the health care to which he or she has access; the ACA diminishes the individual’s freedom to choose. He cited that 6 million Americans had their plans canceled contrary to their wishes and that many lost their ability to see their primary care physicians with the new ACA stipulations, and that the average household insurance premiums rose by around $5,000—a reflection of decreased competition in the health insurance market and the fact that insurance companies raised rates to compensate for more risk in the expanded insurance market. Cruz also cited the long wait times and subsequent tragedies that occur in high-income countries with state-controlled coverage; when government rations health care, hospitals become overburdened and less effective he asserted.

“In America, we do rationing in a different way, Ted,” replied Sanders. He alluded to the tens of thousands of Americans who die because they do not see a doctor when they should, due to a lack of affordable insurance.

While Cruz argued that having access to health care means maintaining the right to choose that health care, Sanders asked, “You want to buy one of Donald Trump’s mansions?” He asserted that per Cruz’s definition, “You have access to do that as well,” said Sanders. “Access doesn’t mean a damn thing”—especially for working class Americans.

As for a U.S. without the ACA, Cruz assured a woman from the audience who was battling breast cancer that her policy would not be canceled because of her preexisting condition. Yet, Cruz did not answer if or how an ACA replacement would mandate that insurance companies ignore preexisting conditions for future policies.

Both Sanders and Cruz mentioned that doctors seem to spend more time filling out forms than they do practicing medicine. Cruz argued this is due to ACA forms; Sanders claimed that this drain on doctors’ time comes from insurance companies, further supporting his end goal of booting insurance companies out of health care and joining the rest of the developed world with a single-payer health care system.

Cruz implored Sanders to join him in a fight to curtail the power of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA).

“Right now, it takes 2 billion dollars to approve a new drug,” Cruz said. “I’ve written legislation to reform the process so we can be curing diseases and curing people.”

Expenses driven by the FDA dissuade drug developers from bringing life-saving drugs to the market and FDA regulations bar international drugs from entering the U.S. market, he asserted. Though disagreeing on the normative power of the FDA, both senators agreed that less-expensive drugs should be imported from abroad.

Cruz did not adequately answer how his alternative to the ACA would expand access to health care for individuals with preexisting conditions while increasing competition and empowering patients; Sanders failed to answer how businesses are expected to shoulder mandated insurance without raising prices or cutting wages. However, this health care conversation is far from over, and these two senators specifically, who are both prospective 2020 presidential candidates, are not through debating.

On social issues, Cruz tends to take more conservative positions. For example, he has said that he is in favor of the death penalty, gun rights and is anti-choice. He has denied the existence of global climate change and supported a flat income tax. He has also declared himself an opponent of the joint agreement with Iran and rapprochement with Cuba, despite being of Cuban descent.

Overall, Cruz has had strong political presence in the states of the first four primaries. According to “Politico,” Cruz, though originally seen as a niche candidate, has come to be seen as a viable threat by rival campaigns and is positioned to replace Trump and Ben Carson as a front-runner if either candidate stumbles. He has attempted to appeal to constituencies that traditionally vote Democratic, using his Latino heritage as a platform.

Rubio is the junior senator from Florida but has indicated that, regardless of whether he wins the Republican presidential nomination, he will not run for re-election to the Senate. He was formerly the Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives. He announced his candidacy for president April 13, 2014 and is currently third in the polls, with 12.3 percent of the vote.

Rubio is one of the most conservative voters in the Senate, with a ranking of 98.67 from the American Conservative Union. He has stated his support for fewer regulations on businesses and for less government control of environmental issues. He is socially conservative, as well, opposing abortion and certain provisions of the Violence Against Women Act. His immigration voting record is less consistent; while he co-authored the Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013, he later opposed its passage through the House of Representatives.

In a 2010 incident, a credit card statement was discovered that seemed to show Rubio using his Republican Party of Florida American Express Card for personal expenses in 2006 and 2007. This issue has been raised again in 2015 as he campaigns. Rubio was cleared of wrongdoing by the Florida Commission of Ethics in 2012 and released the statements in question, which show him personally reimbursing these personal charges in November 2015. Rubio’s conservatism could cause problems when attempting to gain the moderate vote, and his stance on international policy could lose him Tea Party votes.

As the first primaries approach, Rubio has begun to increase fundraising efforts. He is courting the support of several wealthy GOP donors. His background has boosted his platform. Rubio, like Cruz, is of Cuban descent, but Rubio was born in the United States, so questions of nationality are not an issue. His parents were working-class, which has allowed him to attempt to appeal to people of working and middle-class backgrounds.

Though neither in the lead, both of these senators have stayed firmly at the top of the extensive list of GOP candidates, and could be viable nominees for the Republican Party. The next Republican primary debate will air Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2015 at 8:00 pm CST on CNN.

First to announce was Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas Monday, Mar. 23. He made his speech at Liberty University in Virginia, a landmark of evangelical Christianity. His major campaign idea seems to be liberty. “Liberty for whom?” you may ask. Well, I am asking the same question. Cruz’s justification for every major speech point was American Protestantism, thereby universalizing his faith as that of all Conservatives in the United States. He explicitly called for the mobilization of born-again Christians.

Here and there, Cruz actually discussed his political agenda, rather than his relationship with his Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Not only does he want to repeal every single word of Obamacare; he wants to install a flat tax, allow taxes to be done on postcards and abolish the Internal Revenue Service. It seems that he would, in fact, be taking care of tax returns and tax regulation single-handedly and from the Oval Office upon winning the presidential race. He even applied the American Dream to immigration—what an idea!

I must praise Cruz for his use of parallelism. In his unending attack on the current administration, he consistently began his disparaging sentences with “Instead of.” In the end, I was truly drawn in by his implied comparison between himself and the founding fathers. Cruz 2016? Not quite.

Second to announce was Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky. On Tuesday, Apr. 7 in Louisville, Paul announced his plan to return the country to its past prosperity with a focus on the problematic economy and an assurance that the Constitution will restrain the government and its spending. In fact, the majority of his speech opposed the actions of either the Obama administration, focusing on things like Obamacare or foreign borrowing, or the government as a whole, regarding things like Congress’s failure to be scrupulous in reading bills and the need to limit congressional terms as the problem. However, he failed to mention how he aims to fix the problems he was all too enthusiastic to bring to our attention.

The speech seemed hopeful when he began discussing his economic plan, but he never actually explained how he aims to achieve employment for all who want jobs. What he did do was try to gain credibility with the fact that two of his sons work minimum-wage jobs while in school. If you are considering not having kids, take this card out of Paul’s book and have them in order to manipulate them into doing things that will serve your political needs instead! He explained that he wants to lower corporate taxes in order to encourage companies that have taken business abroad to relocate domestically. I do appreciate his desire to bridge the education gap that has been widened by income inequality. He then tied this back to that all too elusive American Dream.

Paul also invoked the power of the Constitution…and the Bill of Rights, separately. Even better is his later claim to believe in the founding documents. I know that this confuses me because he seemed not to be very sure just what they are.

“Justice, opportunity and freedom” are the tenets of his campaign. Apparently, these will become attainable for all when the United States defeats its ultimate enemy.

“The enemy is radical Islam—haters of mankind,” Paul said.

At least he is eloquent.

Third, but not least, to announce was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. However, she did not trap students in an auditorium or go to her home state to do so. On Sunday, Apr. 12 she put out a two-minute video officially declaring her much-expected candidacy. Her main platform is “Getting Started,” and her video features a number of marginalized and economically disenfranchised groups starting new chapters of their lives.

Clinton’s video has an underlying theme of unifying the United States. She invites the American people to go on a journey toward economic equality with her and claims that she will be the nation’s champion. As much as I love her positive, inclusive message, Clinton’s focus is on families. While I realize that this is necessary in order to gain votes, it may be off-putting for young workers and students.

Hillary Clinton is the only of those who have declared so far whose announcement did not attack the current administration. If that does not scream class, I do not know what does.

Finally, we have Republican Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, who announced Monday, Apr. 13 at Freedom Tower in NYC. While his overall announcement was more positive than our two other Republican candidates’ speeches, he just could not resist criticizing Obamacare without offering an alternative and claiming that its repeal would somehow create many jobs. President Obama is not alone under attack; Rubio has already expressed his negative opinion of Hillary Clinton’s campaign ad.

Rubio praised the United States as the land of opportunity, calling upon the American Dream (are we noticing a theme yet?) with the story of his family’s improbable success. In light of the apparent availability of success to families like his own, he enthusiastically expressed his desire to bring about another “American century.” Unfortunately, his story is absolutely an exception to the norm.

He did eventually get to his political agenda. He expressed a need to reduce student debt, and in that aspect, he has my full support. Rubio also hinted at getting rid of degrees that do not produce job-ready graduates, and as an English major and French and religious studies minor, I am sure that he could not have been referencing my humanities degree at all.

Rubio expressed his sentiment that the Christian family is the most important institution in the United States, reminiscent of Cruz’s insistent Evangelical agenda. Ah, the refreshing smell of the exclusionary invocation of religious values. In the end, he warned the country against returning to the failed ideas of past leaders. However, I seem to recall his early insistence on returning to an American century. Perhaps he wanted to be ironic. At least his entire speech was not criticizing the Obama administration.

Former Florida Governor and Republican Jeb Bush, is expected to announce his candidacy soon.

All political bias aside, we should all pay attention to these candidates and use our wonderful right to vote in the 2016 election. We are a large-and-in-charge generation; we should use our incredibly forceful voice! I mean, why would you not want a cute “I Voted” sticker? Happy election season!